In this post, I will take a closer look at the relationship between climate change and water quality by reflecting on a paper by Heath et al. (2012): 'Testing a rapid climate change adaptation assessment for water and sanitation providers in informal settlements in three cities in sub-Saharan Africa'. Since 1990, the urban population in SSA has more than doubled, yet the proportion of people without access to improved drinking water sources (17%) and sanitation facilities (57%) has remained constant. One of aims of the research, which looked at three case studies—Lusaka, Zambia, Naishaka, Kenya, and Antananarivo, Madagascar—was to understand the impacts of changes in temperature, mean hydrological parameters (e.g. amount or intensity of rainfall) and extreme hydrological events (e.g. flood, droughts) on the water and the sanitation technologies and services for these communities.
All three case study cities face the risk of face worse
threats from floods than droughts. An increased frequency and intensity of
flash floods can lead to the contamination of water supply as sewage are washed
into shallow wells and exposed pipes. Flooded latrines and contaminated water
increases the risk of cholera and diarrhoea. In Naivasha, Kenya, a decrease in
rainfall can also cause a deterioration in water quality. Market gardening
becomes impossible with less water, such that flower farms have to reduce their
workforce which leads to reduced income. In turn, households are less able to
pay for water and food, and water use decreases, causing hygiene levels to fall
and the prevalence of diseases to increase. A decrease in the volume of Lake
Naivasha can also cause water quality to deteriorate.
With regards to adapting the climate change in terms of safeguarding
water quality, a mixture of infrastructural improvements, such as sealing wells
and raising latrines to prevent contamination during floods, monitoring
programmes and education were recommended. These need to be adequately
supported by the local water utility or relevant authorities to ensure that
even the poorest, who own the worst latrines, can afford the necessary
upgrades.
My thoughts on the
paper:
Undoubtedly, the increase in frequency of extreme rainfall
events or droughts will have a negative impact on the water system. This is
especially so because of the existing inadequacies in water infrastructure. The
network of water kiosks, for instance, may not be extensive enough to reach every
household, though concurrent improvements need to be made to the latrines if
the network of kiosks were to be expanded.
Hence, I agreed with the author’s point that adapting to
climate change does not need many new processes, as most of the measures can be
described as good practice in flood or drought-prone areas. Moreover, the
built-in resilience of the poor (impact-minimising economic strategies, social
support networks) should be recognised and better harnessed with greater support,
especially in terms of providing assets and resources.
Thanks for reading and till next time ~~:D
Sorry for the delay in commenting on your blog. See recent comments on other post below. You are developing very well your critical comments on several well-chosen, relevant peer-reviewed papers (e.g. this blog). Your description of the papers and critical commentary are very well done - keep it up. Try to promote more interaction on your blog by encouraging some colleagues to comment. The resulting exchanges can really enhance your discussion. You are covering well issues within your thematic area. You may find it helpful to develop a more focused thread linking your posts.
ReplyDelete